|

|
Hardcover ISBN: 0-8027-1488-9 ISBN 13: 978-0-8027-1488-6 Price: $25.00 272 pages Size: 6-1/8 x 9-1/4 September 2008
|
|
Paperback ISBN: 0-8027- ISBN 13: 978-0-8027-1759-7 Price: $17.00 304 pages Size: 5-1/2" x 8-1/4" January 2011
|
|
|
|
The Activist
John Marshall, Marbury V. Madison, and the Myth of Judicial Review
Lawrence Goldstone
Untitled Document
The story of the landmark case that put the “Supreme” in Supreme Court.
Among the many momentous decisions rendered by the Supreme Court, none has had a greater impact
than that passed down in 1803 by Chief Justice John Marshall in the case of Marbury v. Madison. While
the ruling itself was innocuous—denying the plea of a minor functionary named William Marbury
on constitutionally technical grounds—its implications were enormous. For Marshall had, in essence,
claimed for the Supreme Court the right to determine what the Constitution and our laws under it really
mean, known formally as the principle of “judicial review.” Yet, as Lawrence Goldstone shows in his
compelling narrative, that right is nowhere expressed in the Constitution and was not even considered
by its framers, who would never have granted such power in a checks-and-balances system to unelected
officials serving for life.
The Activist underscores the drama that occurred in 1803 by examining the debates that took place during
the Constitutional Convention of 1787—among the most dramatic moments in American history—over
the formation and structure of our judicial system. Goldstone introduces in brief the life and ambition of
John Marshall and the early, fragile years of the Supreme Court, which—until Marshall’s ascension to Chief
Justice—sat atop the weakest of the three branches of government. Marshall made the Court supreme,
and while judicial review has been used sparingly, without it the Court would likely never have intervened
in the 2000 presidential election. Indeed, the great irony Goldstone reveals is that judicial review is now so
entrenched that Justice Antonin Scalia could admit, as he has, that the Supreme Court “made it up” in the
same breath as he insists that justices must adhere steadfastly to the exact words of the Constitution.
Nobody brings the debates of the Constitutional Convention to life better than Lawrence Goldstone, and
in this election year, no more interesting book on the Supreme Court will appear than The Activist, which
makes the past come alive in the present.
|
|
|
|